I certainly don't think so. The problem with WiMax is that, first of all, it's only got one major carrier actually deploying it, and there are very, very, very few devices that have built-in support for it. Second, by the time Sprint gets it deployed in most major cities, other carriers will be deploying their 4th Generation wireless technologies that will be much faster and more widely deployed and accepted. Third, if we're going to put into place a wireless technology to bridge the gap between 3G technologies and future 4G technologies, why not use something that's already supported by many devices; something like municipal Wi-Fi. Finally, municipal Wi-Fi, which uses a technology that is widely supported now, has failed in many major cities already. Why would the response from a technology that requires an external adapter, which doesn't work with many portable devices, and will only be available in a very limited number of cities (hardly the nation-wide access available with current widespread 3G technologies or what will be available with 4G cellular data technologies in a few years), be any different?
WiMax is a great technology, but it's coming too late. Had it arrived as it is today, two or three years ago, it would have had wonderful potential and would have knocked competitors like EV-DO out of the game, but now with better technologies only about three years away and very little widespread adoption, it has no chance. Sorry all you WiMax fans out there.

1 comments:
There isone competing (and possibly compatible) tech to WiMax: LTE. Problem is, LTE has NO devices, NO network overlay and NO real-world speeds, like Sprint is conservatively stating. Note that WiMax has a theoretical speed limit of 70 Mbps both ways, and can realistically achieve 10 Mbps at 10 km. LTE...who knows? Heck, there's only one widely-deployed 3G tech in the US right now, and that's EvDO. I'm typing this from a connection that is currently HSPA but flickers back to EDGE rather often.
So which wins: a true 4G technology that is out right now but not quite rolled out everywhere, or another 4G tech that may well be compatible but is rolled out nowhere, is not a standard yet and merely rests on approval by (at this point) two of the "big four" carriers in the U.S.
I'll take the former. Though it does seem like HD-DVD in the HD-DVD\Blu-Ray war.
Post a Comment